Other - Education

  • 2. Research questions The research question of the proposed research is how satisfied are St. David’s Customers with the mall layout. To investigate the components of customer satisfaction, the proposed research is going to be divided into three sections. Firstly, customers basic information are going to be collected, which is what type of costumer do St. David’s have now? Are the costumers local or visiting from other cities; in additional, their age,. [more]
  • 1. Aim of the research As the developer of St. David’s shopping centre, St. David’s Partnership is planning to conduct this market research project in order to consummate the current design and future plan of St. David’s by gathering the feedback and comments from its current visitors, including the design of shop locations, toilets, information desk service, parking, and etc. Please read here. [more]
  • questions to ensure the interviewer voice inflection didn’t result into biasness of the results. The focus group interviewers were educated on interviews and surveys management to ensure they didn’t end up suggesting possible answers to the study respondents (Trochim et al, 1982). This could have resulted into homogeneous data. The primary goal of educating interviewers was meant to ensure the results obtained were heterogeneous.. [more]
  • The survey tool and questionnaires had been tested on a pilot sample to determine reliability of the survey tool and questionnaires to contribute into study outcomes in terms of conclusion validity, construct validity, external validity and internal validity (Cook & Campbell, 1979). The focus group interviewers were educated on the survey tools and questions to ensure the interviewer voice inflection didn’t result into biasness of the results. Please read here.. [more]
  • The respondents were not informed on the nature of the questions that they were to respond to through the survey tools and questionnaires (Caracelli & Greene, 1997 [cited in J.C. Greene and V.J. Caracelli, 1997, eds]). This was meant to eliminate opportunities of respondent biasness which could have resulted into homogeneous data hence affected the validity of the study. https://www.jiaodianlunwen.com/three-stages-of-the-creative-process.html[more]
  • The respondent’s data was securely kept to reduce access and where respondent’s data was to be transferred; the networks were satisfied to be encrypted and secure. The respondent participation in the study was allowed after the respondent demonstrated understanding of the study ethical perspectives (Cook & Campbell, 1979). The respondents signed informed consent form to demonstrate clarity in understanding study ethical considerations.. [more]
  • The study respondents were education on the study design in order to gain understanding on the procedures of the study, objectives of the study and practical as well as policy implications of the study (Guba & Lincoln, 1989). The study satisfied the principle of malfeasance and beneficence as well as principle of anonymity. The study respondents were informed on anonymity of their participation and that the study results were not for commercial purposes. Thus, the study. [more]
  • . Analysis of continuum of the textual data would be carried out and measures of validity of interpretative comments and quotations done through reflections that would be achieved through textual content application. Internal consistency of the data would be determined followed by contextual analysis and finally the data would be compressed using data reduction strategies (Creswell, 1999). The compressed data outcomes would be analyzed by using interpretation and attaching. [more]
  • Avoiding harm… Are any adverse effects likely on subjects, researchers, institutions or communities from the carrying out of the research and its consequences, including the publication of findings? Have all reasonable steps been taken to eliminate the risk of harm? If the objectives cannot be achieved without risk of harm, should the project be abandoned? Is there any justification for continuing with it? Treating fairly… Do researchers and subjects. [more]
  • 3.2.1 Respecting autonomy… Do the objectives or methodology of the research fail to respect autonomy by, for example, deceit, dishonesty, the invading of privacy, breaking confidentiality or by using data in ways not clearly stated to researchers and subjects? These subjects may include people who are not actively involved in the research but about whom data is used. Are all likely participants, including subjects and researchers, fully informed of the nature of the. [more]
  • Ethical Considerations Ethics is a complex field, but in professional contexts its fundamental concerns are to: • Respect the autonomy of individuals • Avoid causing harm • Treat people fairly • Act with integrity • Use resources as beneficially as possible Each of these issues is addressed in a little more detail below by considering some questions to be addressed when ethically appraising research: https://www.aceessays.com/ideal.html[more]
First Previous 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next Last